|
RB
Joey Harris |
|
2002
Statistics
|
Coach:
Joe Tiller
46-28,
6 years |
2002
Record: 7-6
|
|
ILLINOIS
STATE |
WON
51-10 |
at
Notre Dame |
LOST
17-24 |
WESTERN
MICHIGAN |
WON
28-24 |
WAKE
FOREST |
LOST
21-24 |
MINNESOTA |
WON
28-15 |
at
Iowa |
LOST
28-31 |
at
Illinois |
LOST
31-38 (OT) |
MICHIGAN |
LOST
21-23 |
at
Northwestern |
WON
42-13 |
OHIO
STATE |
LOST
6-10 |
at
Michigan State |
WON
45-42 |
INDIANA |
WON
34-10 |
SUN
BOWL
|
Washington |
WON
34-24 |
|
2002 Final Rankings
AP-UR, Coaches-UR, BCS-UR
|
2003
Outlook
|
It
was a strange season for Purdue in 2002
-- on paper (statistically) the Boilers
looked like they had a great year. But only
three straight wins at the end of the season,
including a Sun Bowl victory over Washington,
got their final record over .500 at 7-6.
The
difference in close losses to Notre Dame,
Iowa, and Ohio State totaled 14 points-
three teams which spent most of the season
in the Top Ten. Purdue starts 2003 with
five of its first six games at home, including
the annual shootout with Notre Dame, and
match-ups with Big Ten rivals Michigan,
Wisconsin, Illinois and Penn State - games
which will decide whether the Boilermakers
can push for a New Year's Day bowl. In addition,
Purdue's only non-conference road game is
at up-and-coming Wake Forest - definitely
winnable if the Boilers have their game
in gear.
The
defense is poised to carry the team, just
how far will be up to the competence of
the offense. Enough firepower is back for
Purdue that the situation is theirs to make,
or break. Young student athletes can make
situations like this special or disappointing.
Our guess: They'll be more successful than
not, and while perhaps not headed for Pasadena,
Purdue fans can likely pencil in a little
bowl-game sunshine come next holiday season.
Projected
2003 record: 8-4
|
|
|
SPRING
MVP
QB Kyle Orton
|
OFFENSIVE
MVP
RB Joey Harris
|
DEFENSIVE
MVP
DE Shaun Phillips
|
TOP
NEWCOMERS
RB Jerome Brooks
OT Mike Otto
|
|
|
|
PURDUE
*POWER RATINGS
|
Offense
|
Defense
|
QB
- 4 |
DL
- 4 |
RB
- 3.5 |
LB
- 4.5 |
WR
- 4.5 |
DB
- 4 |
OL
- 3.5 |
.. |
|
RETURNING
LEADERS
|
Passing:
Kyle Orton, 317-192-9, 2257 yds., 13 TD's
Rushing: Joey Harris, 250 att., 1115
yds., 8 TD's
Receiving: John Standeford, 75 rec.,
1307 yds., 13 TD's
Scoring: Berin Lacevic, 10-19 FG,
48-49 PAT, 78 pts.; John Standeford, 13
TD's, 78 pts.
Punting: Brent Slaton, 63 punts,
39.4 avg.
Kicking: Berin Lacevic, 10-19 FG,
48-49 PAT, 78 pts.
Tackles: Niko Koutouvides, 121 tot.,
80 solo
Sacks: Shaun Phillips, 6 sacks
Interceptions: Niko Koutouvides,
3 for 21 yds.
Kickoff returns: Anthony Chambers,
10 ret., 23.0 avg.
Punt returns: Anthony Chambers, 28
ret., 10.0 avg.
|
|
|
FS
Stuart Schweigert |
|
|
|
PURDUE |
|
|
OFFENSE
- 8
|
----RETURNING
STARTERS----
|
DEFENSE
- 9
|
|
KEY
LOSSES
|
OFFENSE:
Seth Morales-WR, Pete Lougheed-OT, Gene Mruczkowski-C,
Rob Turner-OG, Montrell Lowe-RB, Mike Rhinehart-TE
(inj.) |
DEFENSE:
Brandon
Johnson-DT, Joe Odom-SLB, Ralph Turner-SS |
|
|
|
2003
OFFENSE
|
By
Joe Howley
Royal Oak, Mich.
The
Boilermakers return virtually all of their skill-position
starters in 2003, signaling good things ahead
for coach Joe Tiller's high-voltage offense. Purdue
rang up 29.7 points per game in 2002, third in
the conference, and with most of that talent back
with another year of experience, Tiller should
have another potent offensive team.
Rangy
junior Kyle Orton (6-4, 215) is at the controls
after a decent 2002. He'll be backed up by sophomore
Brandon Kirsch., who threw for 1,067 yards and
eight scores in part-time duty, replacing Orton
in the starting lineup for four games during a
mid-season slump. Kirsch also rushed for 468 yards,
presenting defenses with a whole different nightmare
to contend with compared with the more traditional
passer Orton. Accordingly, a rotation could be
to their advantage.
Whether
the starter is Orton or Kirsch, either will be
throwing to senior John Standeford, a Bilitnekoff
Award finalist in 2002 and the top returning Big
Ten receiver. After grabbing 75 passes for 1,307
yards and 13 TDs, not much else needs to be said.
Opposite Standeford, junior Taylor Stubblefield
actually led the conference in total catches with
77, but didn't present the long ball threat of
Standeford. This complimenting pair also offer
differing talents that opposing coaches cannot
fully stop.
The
Boilers use a three-wideout set. Sophomore Ray
Williams finished the season as that third starter.
He caught only eight passes in 2002, but one was
a 58-yard score, and he will provide another deep
threat that then frees Standeford. Senior Anthony
Chambers was third on the team in catches, and
is likely to push hard to get back into the starting
lineup. Competition bodes well for this position.
With Standeford and Stubblefield back in the fold,
the Purdue receiving corps looks like one of the
best in the country.
Running
back is another solid talent position for Purdue.
Back for his senior year is Joey Harris, a compact
5-11, 215-pounder who can handle a heavy load.
Backup Brandon Jones, now a sophomore, added 683
yards on 127 carries, and actually had a superior
yards-per-carry mark than Harris (5.3 to 4.8).
With the wide receiving corps keeping the defenses
spread and distracted, Purdue should again be
able to run effectively. They were fourth in the
Big Ten in rushing offense - just ahead of national
champion Ohio State.
Charles
Davis took over the starting tight end spot as
a redshirt freshman in 2002 and responded well.
TE blocking will be important early as this line
gets acquainted with each other and the system,
both individually and as a unit. Starter Mike
Rhinehart has been released from scholarship for
health reasons.
The
offensive line doesn't exactly look like a disaster
area for Tiller, but it will require some retooling.
Two fifth-year senior starters graduated, along
with a couple key reserves, so the younger Boilermaker
linemen will have to keep helmets on defenders
so as to allow the skill-position players success.
Junior tackle David Owen and senior center Nick
Pilipauskis are the only experienced backups returning
- meaning several redshirt freshmen and possibly
incoming recruits are going to have to contribute
for the Boilers.
In
addition to being thin in numbers, Purdue is thin
on the OL in a more literal sense. Amazingly,
in the age of monstrous musclemen on the front
lines across college football, not a single Boilermaker
starting OL is listed at over 300 pounds. Even
allowing for a little bit of a fudge factor in
those listings, that's still a remarkably lean
front line by top-level Division I standards.
Purdue's
impressive rushing totals, combined with only
middle-range numbers in sacks allowed, indicate
that regardless of size, the Boilermaker front-liners
have definitely been doing things right. Tiller's
version of the spread places more emphasis on
speed than bulk. But despite leading the conference
in total yardage, Purdue was ninth in red-zone
efficiency, converting only 75.5 percent of the
time inside the 20 - exposing a definite weakness
in the Boilers' attack. Another problem for the
Boilers was turnover margin. Purdue ranked next-to-last
in the conference in turnover margin. Needless
to say, improvement in that area is crucial.
|
|
WR
John Standeford
|
PURDUE
2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
OFFENSE
|
QB |
Kyle
Orton-Jr (6-4, 220) |
Brandon
Kirsch-So (6-3, 201) |
RB |
Joey
Harris-Sr (5-11, 208) |
Jerod
Void-Jr (6-2, 204) |
WR |
John
Standeford-Sr (6-4, 191) |
Andre
Chattams-Fr (6-0, 202) |
WR |
Ray
Williams-So (6-2, 188) |
Jamaal
Wilson-Sr (6-3, 197) |
WR |
Taylor
Stubblefield-Jr (6-1, 172) |
Anthony
Chambers-Sr (6-1, 199) |
TE |
Charles
Davis-So (6-6, 265) |
Jeff
Bennett-Jr (6-4, 253) |
OT |
Mike
Otto-Fr (6-5, 290) |
David
Owen-Jr (6-6, 286) |
OG |
Matt
Turner-So (6-3, 286) |
Brian
Wang-So (6-7, 292) |
C |
Nick
Hardwick-Sr (6-4, 284) |
Nick
Pilipauskis-Sr (6-2, 283) |
OG |
Tyler
Moore-Jr (6-7, 294) |
Uche
Nwaneri-Fr (6-3, 286) |
OT |
Kelly
Butler-Jr (6-8, 315) |
Ryan
Davis-So (6-4, 280) |
K |
Ben
Jones-So (6-0, 205) |
Berin
Lacevic-Sr (5-10, 176) |
|
|
2003
DEFENSE
|
By
Joe Howley
Royal Oak, Mich.
Senior
linebackers Niko Koutouvides and Landon Johnson
are back after ranking 1-2 on the Purdue tackle
list last season. Koutouvides mans the middle
while Johnson plays the weakside. On the strongside,
senior Gilbert Gardner will have first shot to
step into a starting role.
Up
front, the Boilers return all four starters. That
says much - the core of the nation's 23rd ranked
run-defense will be measurably better, both individually
and as a unit.
The
Boilermakers had excellent defensive balance in
2002, ranking fourth in rushing defense and fifth
in passing defense in the Big Ten, which added
up to the best overall yards-per-game defensive
average in the conference, and 20th nationally.
As the football savvy know, it all starts up front.
Really,
it's hard to pick out a glaring weakness for the
Purdue defense - just a few areas where they could
be better. Just as the Boiler offense piled up
some gaudy stats yet misfired in the red-zone
area, the Purdue defense had excellent overall
numbers yet allowed the fourth-worst red-zone
scoring average in the conference. The Boilers
allowed 10 scoring passes from the red zone area
in 2002, definitely an area where improvement
could make a huge difference in the W-L record.
The
talent is there. Senior FS Stuart Schweigert returns
after a somewhat disappointing 2002 season. The
6-3, 215-pounder was tabbed as a top pre-season
contender for all-conference honors, but ended
up with only two interceptions. Of course, that
was due in part to the reluctance of opponents
to throw into his coverage areas, but a big rebound
by the experienced Schweigert in 2003 will provide
a huge spark for the defense. The other secondary
members all re-form as one to make up the same
basic unit that was ranked 23rd in all I-A for
pass efficiency defense.
|
|
LB
Niko Koutouvides
|
PURDUE
2003 DEPTH CHART
Returning Starters in bold
|
DEFENSE
|
DE |
Shaun
Phillips-Sr (6-3, 260) |
Vedran
Dzolovic-Sr (6-3, 260) |
DT |
Craig
Terrill-Sr (6-3, 289) |
Brandon
Villarreal-So (6-2, 287) |
DT |
Brent
Grover-So (6-4, 279) |
Dontrey
Flemings-So (6-2, 293) |
DE |
Kevin
Nesfield-Sr (6-3, 250) |
Brent
Hawkins-So (6-2, 238) |
SLB |
Gilbert
Gardner-Sr (6-2, 228) |
Bobby
Iwuchukwu-So (6-2, 229) |
MLB |
Niko
Koutouvides-Sr (6-3, 237) |
Jon
Goldsberry-Sr (6-3, 241) |
WLB |
Landon
Johnson-Sr (6-2, 221) |
Jason
Leimberger-So (6-2, 230) |
CB |
Jacques
Reeves-Sr (6-1, 195) |
Sean
Petty-So (5-11, 166) |
CB |
Antwaun
Rogers-Jr (6-2, 167) |
Brian
Hickman-So (6-0, 178) |
SS |
Deaunte
Ferrell-Sr (5-11, 195) |
Torrey
Vogel-Sr (5-11, 203) |
FS |
Stuart
Schweigert-Sr (6-3, 213) |
Marc
Huddleston-So (5-11, 192) |
P |
Brent
Slaton-Sr (6-3, 203) |
Aaron
Levin-Jr (5-11, 208) |
|
|
|
2003
SPECIAL TEAMS
|
Senior
punter Brent Slaton was consistent, if unspectacular,
for Purdue in 2002. He averaged 37.7 yards per boot,
and the Boilermaker coverage unit allowed only 3.6 yards
per return - third best in the conference - for a decent
net of 34.1, fourth in the league.
The
rest of the Boilermaker special teams ranged from passable
to pathetic. Placekicker Berin Lacevic was decent on
PATs but erratic on field goals, converting only 10
of 19 attempts. He should be pushed by junior Aaron
Levin. The Purdue kickoff coverage team ranked right
in the middle of the conference standings, allowing
20.2 yards per runback, but both the Boilermaker return
units - kick returns and punt returns - ranked dead
last in the conference. Backup WR Chambers handled both
those duties in 2002, but it's wide-open competition
for both positions in spring and summer drills. We will
get back to you on this one.
|
|
Redshirt freshman RB Jerome Brooks made a
strong case to be the backup to Joey Harris
this season. A great runner between the tackles,
Brooks averaged over four yards per carry
this spring, which included a couple of TDs.
Harris, himself, had a marvelous off-season,
igniting the offense every time he touched
the ball. Do not be fooled, he should be considered
one of the top backs in the conference
Though Kyle Orton will be the starter, backup
Brandon Kirsch had almost identical numbers
this spring. Orton completed 56 % of his passes
for 590 yards, 5 TDs, and threw 1 INT. Kirsch
completed 55 %, tossing for 505 yards, 3 TDs
and 0 INTs. The main difference was maneuverability,
as Kirsch averaged a gain of 4 yards per carry,
Orton lost that much
Two players who
surprised on the receiving end were sophomore
Jameson Evans and RB Jerod Void. Void proved
his inclination to make the big play, averaging
28 yards per catch. WR Jamaal Wilson helped
with the long ball this spring as well
The play of the offensive line is crucial
to this fleet-footed offense. Tiller says
he is pleased with the progression and cohesion
this group is making and is starting to lose
concern in this area. OT Mike Otto is gonna
be a star when all is said and done
Though the LB corps is already talented,
the Boilers got an impressive spring bout
from sophomore Jason Leimberger, who led
all tacklers. Also emerging in the LB group
was rsf George Harris, who was notarized
as the hardest hitter this spring. Look
for him to lay some lumber in a backup role
this fall
Backup FS Marc Huddleston
has made progress this spring and should
give Purdue a solid dimeback when the situation
calls. He has received the bulk of the work
at FS with Stu Schweigert sitting out to
rest an injury
The defensive line
has stepped up this spring, particularly
backup DT Dontrey Flemings. He will remain
a backup, but his emergence should make
it easy and preferred for Spack to rotate
his defensive front, in efforts to keep
fresh
Some freshmen who should see
time this year are DE Ray Edwards and SS
Bernard Pollard, as well as FS Rafael Price.
It
seems as though the kicking problems remain,
as Ben Jones and Berin Lacevic combined
going 8 of 15 in FG attempts. Both seem
fine in short range, but struggled immensely
beyond 40 yards. If this remains true, the
Boilers will be attempting a lot of 4th
down conversions
Chambers and Brooks
will be the primaries returning punts, while
Chambers and soph Jerod Void will take back
kicks
Look for Purdue to block a few
kicks this season, as they have made a concentrated
(and successful) effort this spring to shore
that area of the special teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|